Hitchens Stickers

Why do believers: "Create a mystery to solve a mystery?"

New Atheism is the name given to the ideas promoted by a collection of 21st-century atheist writers who have advocated the view that "religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed by rational argument wherever its influence arises."

90% of Americans believe in God. We are the 10%

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

Don't be ILL. and Don't be such Dictator…like Kim Jong-il.

Present your theological position and watch Sam Harris' left (or is it right?) eyebrow climb northward in classical disbelief.

yes, contemporary religion should be ridiculed

He's still not convinced.

From the urban dictionary: HITCH-SLAP: The act that noted rational atheist Christopher Hitchens must employ on theologists when they attempt to enter discussions that require logic for proof and not "faith". EXAMPLE: Christopher just hitch-slapped Pat Robertson!

One day the world will be free, puppets no more!

Gregory House, M.D., (often simply referred to as House) is a title character and the antihero of the American television series House. He is played by Hugh Laurie. The character is an atheist.

“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.” ---Charles Darwin

Be brave, stay confident, and believe in yourself.

we've all been there: all around us, heads bow, hands are raised in supplication, and all we can do is roll our eyes.

It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense, being Growth with Reproduction; Inheritance which is almost implied by reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the external conditions of life, and from use and disuse; a Ratio of Increase so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural Selection, entailin...

from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved. -CD

the dino represents the strength of our reasoned arguments

yes, these 4 are Fantastic, too.

What do nonbelievers see when viewing a cross? A bunch of LIES.

Richard Dawkins has become “Darwin’s rottweiler”—as Alister McGrath, an Oxford theologian, reminded readers of his recent book, Dawkins’ God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life—so intent on prevailing in intellectual combat that he alienates others and undermines the dazzling quality of his argumentative skills. —Discover Magazine

We'll look back at the Reason Rally as one of the game-changing events when people started to look at atheism and look at atheists in a different light. —David Silverman

The principle of free will has religious, legal, ethical, and scientific implications. The argument from free will (also called the paradox of free will, or theological fatalism) contends that omniscience and free will are incompatible, and that any conception of God that incorporates both properties is therefore inherently contradictory. The argument may focus on the incoherence of people having free will, or else God himself having free will. These arguments are deeply concerned with the implications of predestination, and often seem to echo the standard argument against free will.

it's how Kant would sound saying it…

it's time to bite back!

just cause we don't believe in magic kingdoms doesn't mean we aren't happy

What do nonbelievers see when viewing a cross? A bunch of LIES.

Based on the 3 part Inductive Method 1. precise gathering of quantitative data by observation and experiment 2. emergence of a general hypothesis from the data 3. test the hypothesis through experiment and observation to see if it can be disproved

wear this classic typeface of unbelief.

once you're hooked you stop fishing for faith

"If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes."

Be Proud to call yourself an Infidel.

Cherry picking is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.

let 'em know who you are.

yes, these 4 are Fantastic, too.

Jesus may be your homeboy but Richard Dawkins is my Humanist.

from wiki: The statement "There are no atheists in foxholes" is an aphorism used to argue that in times of extreme stress or fear, such as when participating in warfare, all people will believe in or hope for a higher power.